Geomatics and Environmental Engineering, vol. 17, no. 4

Issue

Vol. 17 No. 4 (2023): Geomatics and Environmental Engineering

Date Log

Submitted
Mar 19, 2023
Accepted
Jun 9, 2023
Published
Jul 21, 2023
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Development of Guide Material for the Education of Cultural Immovable Heritage Management for Bachelor Students of Geomatics Engineering

https://doi.org/10.7494/geom.2023.17.4.77
Yakup Emre Çoruhlu
Karadeniz Technical University, Geomatics Engineering, Trabzon, Turkey
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8673-603X
Sibel Er Nas
Trabzon University, Fatih Faculty of Education, Trabzon, Turkey
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5970-2811
Bayram Uzun
Karadeniz Technical University, Geomatics Engineering, Trabzon, Turkey
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6492-6820
Okan Yıldız
Karadeniz Technical University, Geomatics Engineering, Trabzon, Turkey
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7664-5361
Fatih Şahin
Karadeniz Technical University, Geomatics Engineering, Trabzon, Turkey
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3824-9069
Fatih Terzi
Karadeniz Technical University, Geomatics Engineering, Trabzon, Turkey
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2088-6200
Mehmet Özgür Çelik
Mersin University, Geomatics Engineering, Mersin, Turkey
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4569-888X

Corresponding Author(s) : Yakup Emre Çoruhlu

yecoruhlu@ktu.edu.tr

Geomatics and Environmental Engineering, Vol. 17 No. 4 (2023): Geomatics and Environmental Engineering

Abstract

Türkiye has a wealth of foundations and their properties, assets managed by the General Directorate of Foundations (GDF) through its geomatics engineers. This article aims to identify the misconceptions of senior undergraduate geomatics engineering students (sample group) about the relationship between foundations and land ownership registered as cultural heritage. It will develop and implement materials to eliminate these misconceptions and evaluate their effectiveness. This study consists of a preliminary, a pilot and the main application. The data collection instruments are an open-ended questionnaire, a semi-structured interview form and conceptual understanding tests. As a result of the analysis of the pre-study and the pilot study, guidance materials on information deficits and misunderstandings in the application of Article 30 of the Law on Foundations were developed. In the analysis of the quantitative data, the Wilcoxon signed-rank test is used, a non-parametric analysis methods. In the light of the data obtained from the study, it is recommended that materials be developed in other areas of land management to investigate their effectiveness.

Keywords

teaching skills student assessment senior engineering education material development
Çoruhlu, Y. E., Er Nas, S., Uzun, B., Yıldız, O., Şahin, F., Terzi, F., & Çelik, M. Özgür. (2023). Development of Guide Material for the Education of Cultural Immovable Heritage Management for Bachelor Students of Geomatics Engineering. Geomatics and Environmental Engineering, 17(4), 77–100. https://doi.org/10.7494/geom.2023.17.4.77
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
References
  1. Koyunoğlu H.H.: Sosyal Politika Açısından Vakıflar ve XVII. Yüzyıl İstanbul Uygulaması [Waqfs from the point of social policy view: An example of Istanbul in 17th century]. Istanbul University, 2002 [dissertation].
  2. Akyildiz Y., Abay A.R.: Vakıf Müessesesinin Gelişimi Ve Mahiyeti Tarihsel Bir Değerlendirme [Development and Nature of the Foundation Institute a Historical Evaluation]. Yalova Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, vol. 7(15), 2017, pp. 141–157. https://doi.org/10.17828/yalovasosbil.372776.
  3. Asni F., Mahamud M.A., Sulong J.: Socio-economics and management of Muslim cemetery waqf using istibdal and GIS method in Penang state. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, vol. 11(7), 2020, pp. 1343–1362. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-01-2019-0026.
  4. Berki Ş.: Vakfın Mahiyeti [Nature of the Foundation]. Vakıflar Dergisi, 8, Ankara 1934.
  5. Ertunç H.: İslam Hukuk Tarihinde Vakıflar İle Batı Kültüründeki Benzeri Kurumların Karşılaştırılması [The comparison of foundations in islamic law history and the same institutions of west culture]. Atatürk University, Erzurum 2007 [dissertation].
  6. Çoruhlu Y.E.: Registration of foundation properties–cultural asset on behalf of their own fused foundations. Survey Review, vol. 48(347), 2016, pp. 110–120.
  7. Law on Foundations. Official Gazette No 26800, 27.02.2008, Ankara, Türkiye.
  8. Kaur P.: Legal regime for the protection of heritage stone monuments in India: A study with special reference to Taj Mahal and Lotus Temple. Geoheritage, vol. 14, 2022, 87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-022-00721-9.
  9. Salamzadeh A., Ebrahimi P., Soleimani M., Farkas M.F.: An AHP approach to identify the barriers of sustainable geotourism development in Iran: An economic view. Geoheritage, vol. 13, 2021, 65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-021-00581-9.
  10. Morgan P., Hodgkinson R., Enemark S.: Quality Assurance in Surveying Education. FIG Publication No. 19, FIG, Copenhagen, Denmark. https://www.fig.net/resources/publications/figpub/pub19/figpub19.asp [access: 17.07.2018].
  11. Enemark S.: Innovation in surveying education. Global Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 6(2), 2002, pp. 153–159.
  12. Enemark S.: Promoting the interaction between education, research and professional practice. [in:] Scientia Est Potentia – Knowledge is Power: FIG Commission 2 – Symposium, Czech Technical University, Prague, Czech Republic, 7–9 June, 2007, 2007, pp. 21–36.
  13. Enemark S.: Surveying education: Facing the challenges of the future. [in:] Navigating the Future of Surveying Education. FIG Commission 2 Workshop, Vienna, Austria, 26–28 February 2009, pp. 1–11.
  14. Todorovski D., Zevenbergen J., Groenendijk L.: Land administration master’s programme mission revisited. [in:] FIG Working Week 2017: Surveying the World of Tomorrow: From Digitalisation to Augmented Reality, FIG, Helsinki, Finland, pp. 1–16.
  15. Chigbu U., Enemark S., Zevenbergen J.: Improving the mode of academic networking to scale up land education in Africa. [in:] FIG Working Week 2020: Smart surveyors for land and water management, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, 10–14 May 2020, pp. 1–19.
  16. Baser V., Yıldırım F.: Analysis the geomatics discipline in Turkey. Sigma: Journal of Engineering and Natural Sciences, vol. 38(2), 2020, pp. 889–906. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/2010415.
  17. Bogdan R.C., Biklen S.K.: Qualitative Research in Education: An Introduction to Theory and Methods. 5th ed., Pearson, 2006.
  18. Arıkan R.: Araştırma Teknikleri ve Rapor Hazırlama [Research Techniques and Report Preparation]. Asil Edition, Ankara 2004.
  19. Chambers S.K., Andre T.: Gender, prior knowledge, interest and experience in electricity and conceptual change text manipulations in learning about direct current. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol. 34(2), 1997, pp. 107–123. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199702)34:2<107::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-X.
  20. Demirci O.: 8. sınıf öğrencilerinin asitler ve bazlar konusuyla ilgili yanılgılarını gidermede animasyon destekli kavramsal değişim metinlerinin etkililiğinin araştırılması [Investigating the Effectiveness of AnimationSupported-Conceptual Change Texts on the Remediation of Eight Grade Students’ Misconceptions of Acids and Bases]. Karadeniz Technical University, 2011 [dissertation].
  21. Senel Coruhlu T., Calik M., Cepni S.: Effect of conceptual change pedagogies on students’ alternative conceptions of electricity resistance and electricity current. Energy Education Science and Technology. Part B: Social and Educational Studies, vol. 4(1), 2012, pp. 141–152. https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:000292127400015.
  22. Şenel Çoruhlu T., Kirman Bilgin A., Er Nas S.: The effect of enriched learning environments on the conceptual understanding of students: “The Erosion and Landslide”. Journal of Education and Training Studies, vol. 4(10), 2016, pp. 248–260. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v4i10.1892.
  23. Şenel Çoruhlu T., Er Nas S.: The impact of guiding materials on students’ conceptual understanding: The case of “What Is the Earth’s Crust Composed of?”. Journal of Education and Training Studies, vol. 5(2), 2017, pp. 194–206. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v5i2.2169.
  24. An B.P., Loes C.N.: Participation in high-impact practices: Considering the role of institutional context and a person-centered approach. Research in Higher Education, vol. 64, 2022, pp. 520–546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-022-09715-6.
  25. Invernizzi D.C., Locatelli G., Brookes N., Davis A.: Qualitative comparative analysis as a method for project studies: The case of energy infrastructure. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 133, 2020, 110314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110314.
  26. Yin R.K.: Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 5th ed. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, New York 2013.
  27. Geddes B.: Paradigms and Sand Castles: Theory Building and Research Design in Comparative Politics. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor 2003. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.11910.
  28. Mills A.J., Durepos G., Wiebe E.: Encyclopedia of Case Study Research. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, New York 2010.
  29. Rolls G.: Classic Case Studies in Psychology. Hodder Education, Abingdon 2005.
  30. Kirori M., Dickinson D.: Not a panacea, but vital for improvement? Leadership development programmes in South African schools. South African Journal of Education, vol. 40(1), 2020, 1625. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v40n1a1625.
  31. Taylor M.L., Søndergaar M.: Unraveling the Mysteries of Case Study Research: A Guide for Business and Management Students. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham 2017.
  32. Blankenberger B., Gehlhausen Anderson S., Lichtenberger E.: Improving institutional evaluation methods: Comparing three evaluations using PSM, Exact and Coarsened Exact Matching. Research in Higher Education, vol. 62, 2021, pp. 1248–1275 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-021-09632-0.
  33. Kearney M., Maher D., Pham L.: Investigating pre-service teachers’ informallydeveloped online professional learning networks. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 36(1), 2020, pp. 21–36. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.4766.
  34. Woolfolk A.E.: Educational Psychology. Allyn and Bacon, Boston 1998.
  35. Adıgüzel H.Ö.: Eğitimde Yeni Bir Yöntem ve Disiplin: Yaratıcı Drama. [in:] Adıgüzel H.Ö. (Ed.), Yaratıcı Drama 1985-1998 Yazılar, 2. Baskı, Naturel Yayıncılık, Ankara 2006, pp. 203–222.
  36. Marek E.: Understandings and misunderstandings of biology concepts. The American Biology Teacher, vol. 48(1), 1986, pp. 37–40. https://doi.org/10.2307/4448184.
  37. International Federation of Surveyors (FIG): FIG in brief. https://www.fig.net/about/index.asp [access: 17.03.2020].
  38. Markus B.: Thinking about e-learning. [in:] Sharing Good Practices: E-learning in Surveying, Geo-information Sciences and Land Administration: FIG International Workshop 2008, Enschede, The Netherlands, 11–13 June 2008, pp. 1–16.
  39. Groenendijk L., Markus B. (eds.): Enhancing Surveying Education through e-Learning. FIG Publication No. 46, FIG, Copenhagen 2010. https://www.fig.net/resources/publications/figpub/pub46/figpub46.pdf [access: 17.03.2020].
  40. Plimmer F.: Mutual recognition of professional qualifications: The European Union system. [in:] 3rd FIG Regional Conference, Jakarta: Indonesia, October 3–7, 2004, pp. 1–17.
  41. Diakidoy I.A.N., Kendeou P., Ioannides C.: Reading about energy: The effects of text structure in science learning and conceptual change. Contemporary Educational Psychology, vol. 28, 2003, pp. 335–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-476X(02)00039-5.
  42. Akbaş Y., Gençtürk E.: The Effect of Conceptual Change Approach to Eliminate 9th Grade High School Students’ Misconceptions about Air Pressure. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri – Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, vol. 11(4), 2011, pp. 2217–2222.
  43. Şahin Ç., Bülbül E., Durukan Ü.G.: Öğrencilerin gök cisimleri konusundaki alternatif kavramlarinin giderilmesinde kavramsal değişim metinlerinin etkisi [The effect of conceptual change texts on removing students’ alternative conceptions about celestial bodies]. Journal of Computer and Education Research, vol. 1(2), 2013, pp. 38–64. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/jcer/issue/18614/196495.
  44. O’Connor C., Hayden H.: Contextualising nanotechnology in chemistry education. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, vol. 9(1), 2008, pp. 35–42. https://doi.org/10.1039/b801289j.
  45. Potter N.M., Overton T.L.: Chemistry in sport: context-based e-learning in chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, vol. 7(3), 2006, pp. 195–202. https://doi.org/10.1039/B6RP90008A.
  46. Dori Y.J., Sasson I.: Chemical understanding and graphing skills in an honors casebased computerized chemistry laboratory environment: The value of bidirectional visual and textual representations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol. 45, 2008, pp. 219–250. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20197.
  47. Kutu H., Sozbilir M.: Teaching “Chemistry in Our Lives” Unit in the 9th Grade Chemistry Course through Contect-Based ARCS Instructional Model. Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi – Ondokuz Mayıs University Journal of Faculty of Education, vol. 30(1(2)), 2011, pp. 29–62.
  48. Kahyaoğlu H., Yavuzer Y., Aydede M.N.: Fen Bilgisi dersinin öğretiminde yaratıcı drama yönteminin akademik başarıya etkisi [The effect of creative drama method on achievement in science teaching]. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi – Journal of Turkish Educational Sciences, vol. 8(3), 2010, pp. 741–758. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/tebd/issue/26103/275032.
  49. Aykaç M., Adıgüzel Ö.: The effect of using creative drama as a method in social studies class on students’ achievement. Kastamonu Education Journal, vol. 19(1), 2011, pp. 297–314. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/kefdergi/issue/49053/625840.
  50. Michalik A., Zwirowicz-Rutkowska A.: A geoportal supporting spatial planning in Poland: Concept and pilot version. Geomatics and Environmental Engineering, vol. 17(2), 2023, pp. 5–30. https://doi.org/10.7494/geom.2023.17.2.5
  51. Matuk O.: Quantitative analysis of land use classification in agricultural and forest areas. Geomatics and Environmental Engineering, vol. 16(4), 2022, pp. 59–77. https://doi.org/10.7494/geom.2022.16.4.59.
Read More
Author biographies is not available.
Download this PDF file
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 261 Download : 135

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.